Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33251 - 33260 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33251 - 33260 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in child support, but only in placement and restrictions on alcohol use. Diane filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209404 - 2018-03-02
in child support, but only in placement and restrictions on alcohol use. Diane filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209404 - 2018-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1) that he should be resentenced based on a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1) that he should be resentenced based on a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Gattie
postconviction motion to modify that sentence. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20953 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion to modify that sentence. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20953 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the circuit court’s prior ruling regarding the tax deductibility of the maintenance payments. Her motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
in the circuit court’s prior ruling regarding the tax deductibility of the maintenance payments. Her motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
Atlanta Casualty Companies v. Ka Vue
PER CURIAM. Linda Brandt appeals an order that denied her motion to amend a pleading and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7622 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Linda Brandt appeals an order that denied her motion to amend a pleading and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he filed a series of motions seeking relief from this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425952 - 2021-09-14
to the no-merit report, and he filed a series of motions seeking relief from this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425952 - 2021-09-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were dismissed, Polar filed a motion to reopen the revocation hearing based on the fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251802 - 2019-12-23
were dismissed, Polar filed a motion to reopen the revocation hearing based on the fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251802 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of her motion to suppress. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174402 - 2017-09-21
of her motion to suppress. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174402 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3 In January 2010, Brophy filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3 In January 2010, Brophy filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
SCHUDSON, J.[1] Anthony L. Tucker, pro se, appeals from the order denying his motion “for amended terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] Anthony L. Tucker, pro se, appeals from the order denying his motion “for amended terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31