Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33321 - 33330 of 63911 for records/1000.
Search results 33321 - 33330 of 63911 for records/1000.
State v. Kenneth J. Mathers
in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶18 The primary factors the trial court must consider in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19321 - 2005-08-16
in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶18 The primary factors the trial court must consider in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19321 - 2005-08-16
State v. Richard E. Davis
). We see no factual basis in the record that would support either instruction. Whether Davis had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
). We see no factual basis in the record that would support either instruction. Whether Davis had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristina L. Vogt
not have accepted a plea offer is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. Trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
not have accepted a plea offer is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. Trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
office. She also pointed to a post-March 21 letter from what we assume from the Record is an employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26884 - 2014-09-15
office. She also pointed to a post-March 21 letter from what we assume from the Record is an employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This issue is easily resolved on the ground that the record contains almost no evidence that George lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145363 - 2017-09-21
This issue is easily resolved on the ground that the record contains almost no evidence that George lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145363 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis Edward Mack
the evidence, and referred to facts not of record. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8503 - 2005-03-31
the evidence, and referred to facts not of record. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8503 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and brief recitation of record facts, consists of two sentences. ¶17 It is true that courts may make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89358 - 2012-11-14
and brief recitation of record facts, consists of two sentences. ¶17 It is true that courts may make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89358 - 2012-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the issue statement and brief recitation of record facts, consists of two sentences. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89358 - 2014-09-15
from the issue statement and brief recitation of record facts, consists of two sentences. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89358 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to purchase (e.g., the parties’ contract) was not made part of the Record, and the circuit court therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017415 - 2025-10-01
to purchase (e.g., the parties’ contract) was not made part of the Record, and the circuit court therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017415 - 2025-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
] contemplates a process of reasoning. This process must depend on facts that are of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28
] contemplates a process of reasoning. This process must depend on facts that are of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28