Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 74540 for public records.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 74540 for public records.
State v. Jeremy G. Squires
was submitted on the briefs of Charles Bennett Vetzner, Assistant State Public Defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11714 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the briefs of Charles Bennett Vetzner, Assistant State Public Defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
App 8, ¶7 n.3, 406 Wis. 2d 132, 139, 986 N.W.2d 306 (we may take judicial notice of CCAP records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697921 - 2023-08-31
App 8, ¶7 n.3, 406 Wis. 2d 132, 139, 986 N.W.2d 306 (we may take judicial notice of CCAP records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697921 - 2023-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record.” WIS. STAT. § 973.20(5)(a). Special damages are “readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241694 - 2019-06-06
in the record.” WIS. STAT. § 973.20(5)(a). Special damages are “readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241694 - 2019-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kramer and watching video footage of the stop that had been recorded on Kramer’s body camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
Kramer and watching video footage of the stop that had been recorded on Kramer’s body camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Zurkowski asserts, “Nonetheless, the evidence in the record must be sufficiently strong that it excludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51165 - 2014-09-15
, Zurkowski asserts, “Nonetheless, the evidence in the record must be sufficiently strong that it excludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51165 - 2014-09-15
Susan Monfils v. Marlyn Charles
were members. Charles allegedly counseled Kutska to confront Monfils, to make Monfils’s action public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12387 - 2005-03-31
were members. Charles allegedly counseled Kutska to confront Monfils, to make Monfils’s action public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12387 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“that looks beyond the formal title to determine whether the record owner is the ‘actual’ owner”); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
“that looks beyond the formal title to determine whether the record owner is the ‘actual’ owner”); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 2, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
of discretion “if it relies on the relevant facts in the record and applies the proper legal standard to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36671 - 2009-06-01
of discretion “if it relies on the relevant facts in the record and applies the proper legal standard to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36671 - 2009-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference that these matters are appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512871 - 2022-04-26
a review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference that these matters are appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512871 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2008. We have jurisdiction nevertheless. See WIS. STAT. § 808.04(8) (“If the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35269 - 2014-09-15
, 2008. We have jurisdiction nevertheless. See WIS. STAT. § 808.04(8) (“If the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35269 - 2014-09-15