Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3361 - 3370 of 50071 for our.
Search results 3361 - 3370 of 50071 for our.
State v. Hardill Bowie
probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. at 694. Because Bowie must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21225 - 2006-02-06
probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. at 694. Because Bowie must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21225 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to amend his judgment of conviction and resentence him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
motion to amend his judgment of conviction and resentence him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
CA Blank Order
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
CA Blank Order
a judgment of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117164 - 2014-07-13
a judgment of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117164 - 2014-07-13
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
. This appeal follows. ¶3 Our role on certiorari review is limited to whether the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6305 - 2005-03-31
. This appeal follows. ¶3 Our role on certiorari review is limited to whether the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to DeJohnett’s guilty pleas, our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to DeJohnett’s guilty pleas, our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the Record and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970084 - 2025-06-18
N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the Record and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970084 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP432-CRNM 3 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825641 - 2024-07-17
. No. 2023AP432-CRNM 3 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825641 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to amend his judgment of conviction and resentence him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
motion to amend his judgment of conviction and resentence him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Wilcoxson
of our remand in the previous appeal prevents the trial court from attempting any resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11466 - 2017-09-19
of our remand in the previous appeal prevents the trial court from attempting any resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11466 - 2017-09-19