Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33651 - 33660 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33651 - 33660 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Christopher J. Burt
). On appeal, Burt challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25690 - 2006-06-27
). On appeal, Burt challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25690 - 2006-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to justify the stop. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117134 - 2014-07-15
, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to justify the stop. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117134 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motions seeking a new trial. Anderson contends that: (1) minorities were excluded from the jury pool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82293 - 2014-09-15
motions seeking a new trial. Anderson contends that: (1) minorities were excluded from the jury pool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
, 98-0059-W 3 PER CURIAM. Robert and Jean Pace appeal an order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13242 - 2017-09-21
, 98-0059-W 3 PER CURIAM. Robert and Jean Pace appeal an order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to suppress evidence. 1 This appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173507 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress evidence. 1 This appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked the capacity to sue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked the capacity to sue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
State v. Timothy White
, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify sentence.[2] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify sentence.[2] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion raising this issue and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
a postconviction motion raising this issue and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within the one-year time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2983 - 2005-03-31
. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within the one-year time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2983 - 2005-03-31