Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3371 - 3380 of 20869 for word.
Search results 3371 - 3380 of 20869 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Chandler D. Hall
. Under § 939.23(4), STATS., the words "with intent to" in a statute mean that "the actor ... has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
. Under § 939.23(4), STATS., the words "with intent to" in a statute mean that "the actor ... has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
and caused the accident. Radovan observed Kuklinski had very bloodshot eyes, slurred his words, walked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
and caused the accident. Radovan observed Kuklinski had very bloodshot eyes, slurred his words, walked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement.” Id. The court need not recite “magic words” or follow “an inflexible script.” Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40232 - 2014-09-15
agreement.” Id. The court need not recite “magic words” or follow “an inflexible script.” Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40232 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a citizen[.]’” Mendenhall, 446 U.S. at 552 (citation omitted). In other words, if “a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
of a citizen[.]’” Mendenhall, 446 U.S. at 552 (citation omitted). In other words, if “a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
was left alone to write down, in his own words, what happened on the day Anastasia died. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
was left alone to write down, in his own words, what happened on the day Anastasia died. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
contract, the trial court may consider extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent through their words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31
contract, the trial court may consider extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent through their words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
-61. ¶7 In other words, the question of first impression before the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
-61. ¶7 In other words, the question of first impression before the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decision.[3] The word “shall” is presumed to be mandatory, not directory, when it appears in a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26639 - 2006-10-02
decision.[3] The word “shall” is presumed to be mandatory, not directory, when it appears in a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26639 - 2006-10-02
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
.2d 286, 288 (1982). Moreover, “[a] statute should be construed so that no word or clause shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
.2d 286, 288 (1982). Moreover, “[a] statute should be construed so that no word or clause shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
in each case. Each form included a line under which were printed the words, “Signature of Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6482 - 2017-09-19
in each case. Each form included a line under which were printed the words, “Signature of Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6482 - 2017-09-19