Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33801 - 33810 of 40010 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33801 - 33810 of 40010 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The unsworn statement Burris filed with his motion for reconsideration also did not include any factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
The unsworn statement Burris filed with his motion for reconsideration also did not include any factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Glover
adopted as credible the remainder of Peters’ testimony and noted Peters’ statement that she observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
adopted as credible the remainder of Peters’ testimony and noted Peters’ statement that she observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the statement he gave police … at the police station should have been suppressed because he did not waive his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653144 - 2023-05-02
that the statement he gave police … at the police station should have been suppressed because he did not waive his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653144 - 2023-05-02
CA Blank Order
and to seek suppression of his statement and other evidence. He said that he understood. The trial court told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128829 - 2014-11-12
and to seek suppression of his statement and other evidence. He said that he understood. The trial court told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128829 - 2014-11-12
State v. Dorian B. Stock
that during opening statements the State framed its case in terms of § 951.14(2)(b)2 stating that the shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31
that during opening statements the State framed its case in terms of § 951.14(2)(b)2 stating that the shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31
Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
determined that the overriding consideration was the child’s best interest. This is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6331 - 2005-03-31
determined that the overriding consideration was the child’s best interest. This is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6331 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
goals for Wis. Stat. chs. 302 to 304. The fact that such a broad statement of purpose does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
goals for Wis. Stat. chs. 302 to 304. The fact that such a broad statement of purpose does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
State v. Da Vang
assistance of counsel prior to trial. He contends that a statement made to him by his attorney regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2366 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel prior to trial. He contends that a statement made to him by his attorney regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2366 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court’s statement, nothing is self-evident in this statutory language. Further, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
to the circuit court’s statement, nothing is self-evident in this statutory language. Further, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
State v. Carl R. Kramer
denying his motion to dismiss and the judgment of conviction.[2] STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion to dismiss and the judgment of conviction.[2] STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31