Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33821 - 33830 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.

Ronald L. Bennett v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
insured was negligent. West Bend filed a motion for summary judgment asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9736 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, and consequently, the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress. We conclude that the police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jerold L. Rober
of the circuit court denying his motion for sentence modification. Rober contends that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied Patricia Ziebell’s motion to dismiss the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4241 - 2017-09-19

State v. Nikolaus Nytsch
to trial, Nytsch brought a motion seeking an order requiring the State to elect whether it would present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4278 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
decision on Hiler’s postconviction motion. Hiler was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334563 - 2021-02-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
should have granted Inman’s motions to suppress evidence. With respect to the entry of the no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21

State v. Arthur J. McCoy
motion. We affirm. ¶2 McCoy first argues that his right to a fair trial was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Myra Levine (Heilprin) v. Richard Heilprin
is frivolous, and grant Levine's motion for costs and reasonable attorney's fees. The parties divorced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8544 - 2017-09-19

Town of Oconomowoc v. Maurice Mihelich
was transferred from the municipal court to the circuit court where Mihelich filed a motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9875 - 2005-03-31