Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34011 - 34020 of 55155 for n c.

COURT OF APPEALS
because counsel did not cite Santana-Lopez, ¶6 n.4, to support application of the state-of-mind hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66551 - 2011-06-28

COURT OF APPEALS
Kathleen S. Cox and Kimberly C. Whalen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hawk’s Landing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-C of Crane’s brief. See Hennig v. Ahearn, 230 Wis. 2d 149, 173, 601 N.W.2d 14 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75601 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
). C. We need not address Howard’s argument that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106926 - 2014-01-21

State v. Nathan John Lalor
methodology to predict future sexual violence. Kienitz, 227 Wis. 2d at 439 n.12. The weight to be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2322 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karmin M. Maritato v. Mario B. Maritato
the child, whom either party is legally obligated to support. (c) If the parties were married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6735 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 184
C. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26256 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not ineffective in this regard. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 697. c. Trial counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96736 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
: WILLIAM C. STEWART, JR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112357 - 2014-05-12

[PDF] WI APP 102
proceedings following the guilt phase have been lost.” Id. at 810 n.5. Consequently, the court in Randall I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66076 - 2014-09-15