Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34021 - 34030 of 57948 for a i x.
Search results 34021 - 34030 of 57948 for a i x.
COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.3 I. BACKGROUND ¶4 Police received a 911 call that reported a potential domestic violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
.3 I. BACKGROUND ¶4 Police received a 911 call that reported a potential domestic violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. DEVIN LEE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. DEVIN LEE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
State v. Foist Johnson
809.62, Stats. No. 96-2425-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11313 - 2005-03-31
809.62, Stats. No. 96-2425-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11313 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Loranger
was a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment and article I, § 11, and was therefore unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3380 - 2005-03-31
was a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment and article I, § 11, and was therefore unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3380 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 asserts that “[i]n the interest of finality and judicial economy,” this court should “overlook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
6 asserts that “[i]n the interest of finality and judicial economy,” this court should “overlook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2015TP000079 2015TP000080 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165137 - 2017-09-21
. 2015TP000079 2015TP000080 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165137 - 2017-09-21
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
. Appeal No. 01-1521 Cir. Ct. No. 96FA961107 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 01-1521 Cir. Ct. No. 96FA961107 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic
of courtesy, I am informing the Court of that; but I am bound by his instructions not to make an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
of courtesy, I am informing the Court of that; but I am bound by his instructions not to make an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31