Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34061 - 34070 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 34061 - 34070 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying successive motions and relief he sought through letters he filed in the circuit court seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244827 - 2019-08-06
denying successive motions and relief he sought through letters he filed in the circuit court seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244827 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
WI 68
-Respondent. ORDER ON MOTION TO FILE NON-PARTY BRIEF ORDER FILED: July 12, 2011 SUBMITTED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67837 - 2014-09-15
-Respondent. ORDER ON MOTION TO FILE NON-PARTY BRIEF ORDER FILED: July 12, 2011 SUBMITTED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67837 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an order that denied his motion to vacate a deoxyribonucleic acid surcharge imposed at his sentencing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74177 - 2011-11-21
an order that denied his motion to vacate a deoxyribonucleic acid surcharge imposed at his sentencing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74177 - 2011-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Antonio T. Maddox, pro se, appeals from an order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
CURIAM. Antonio T. Maddox, pro se, appeals from an order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and denying his motion for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105209 - 2017-09-21
and denying his motion for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. Allen appeals the nonfinal order denying his motions for continuance and to amend his witness list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138607 - 2017-09-21
A. Allen appeals the nonfinal order denying his motions for continuance and to amend his witness list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138607 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) postconviction motion. The motion raised eleven allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104696 - 2013-11-25
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) postconviction motion. The motion raised eleven allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104696 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Huandra Murray, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742123 - 2023-12-19
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Huandra Murray, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742123 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Smith argues that the trial court erred when it found that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164274 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Smith argues that the trial court erred when it found that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164274 - 2017-09-21