Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34161 - 34170 of 69954 for hi.
Search results 34161 - 34170 of 69954 for hi.
State v. Joseph W. Perry
are created, terminated or transferred” as required under § 943.38(1)(a). We disagree and affirm his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12259 - 2005-03-31
are created, terminated or transferred” as required under § 943.38(1)(a). We disagree and affirm his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 57
more time than his or her sentence calls for. State v. Johnson, 2009 WI 57, ¶31, 318 Wis. 2d 21, 767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07
more time than his or her sentence calls for. State v. Johnson, 2009 WI 57, ¶31, 318 Wis. 2d 21, 767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
provisions of the law before entering its final decision and order; his constitutional rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
provisions of the law before entering its final decision and order; his constitutional rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Officer Stikl looked up K.S.'s physical description on his department's local system. As Officer Stikl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373919 - 2021-08-02
, Officer Stikl looked up K.S.'s physical description on his department's local system. As Officer Stikl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373919 - 2021-08-02
State v. Mark W. Roob
an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 940.225(2)(g) (2007-08)[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion. First, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35370 - 2009-01-28
. Stat. § 940.225(2)(g) (2007-08)[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion. First, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35370 - 2009-01-28
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
, two of which were not presented in his petition. We refuse to address them because interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6985 - 2005-03-31
, two of which were not presented in his petition. We refuse to address them because interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6985 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 93
§ 948.12(1m) (2009-10)1. He appeals his judgment of conviction. Cameron contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85232 - 2014-09-15
§ 948.12(1m) (2009-10)1. He appeals his judgment of conviction. Cameron contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85232 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
appeals his judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Parnell was convicted of (1) second-degree
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16000 - 2005-03-31
appeals his judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Parnell was convicted of (1) second-degree
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16000 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony?” and Juror 22 said: “Yes, it would.” The prosecutor then asked if Juror 22 could put his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24
testimony?” and Juror 22 said: “Yes, it would.” The prosecutor then asked if Juror 22 could put his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24