Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34181 - 34190 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 34181 - 34190 of 38489 for t's.
State v. John Patrick Feeney
in leaving the state to be relevant, he is incorrect. “[T]he motivation behind a defendant’s absence from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
in leaving the state to be relevant, he is incorrect. “[T]he motivation behind a defendant’s absence from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
WI APP 79
this commonsense approach of calculating who is “not more than 4 years older” than the victim. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50226 - 2014-09-15
this commonsense approach of calculating who is “not more than 4 years older” than the victim. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50226 - 2014-09-15
League of Women Voters v. Madison Community Foundation
recusal, she had concluded: “[T]he standards set forth in § 701.10(2)(b), Stats., apply to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19925 - 2005-12-11
recusal, she had concluded: “[T]he standards set forth in § 701.10(2)(b), Stats., apply to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19925 - 2005-12-11
Paul Faust v. Cynthia Johnson
of the child” and “[t]here has been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry of the last order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12718 - 2005-03-31
of the child” and “[t]here has been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry of the last order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12718 - 2005-03-31
Rana R. Lofthus v. Paul Malcolm Lofthus
or her child if the court finds … [t]here has been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
or her child if the court finds … [t]here has been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 24, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414640 - 2021-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 24, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414640 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius Reed
[at the trial] could have gone either way,” and that “[t]here was evidence from which I feel a jury could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9497 - 2017-09-19
[at the trial] could have gone either way,” and that “[t]here was evidence from which I feel a jury could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9497 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles J. Burroughs
is a persistent repeater if “[t]he actor has been convicted of a serious felony on 2 or more separate occasions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
is a persistent repeater if “[t]he actor has been convicted of a serious felony on 2 or more separate occasions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
Nancy Montalvo v. Terre Borkovec, M.D.
was submitted on the brief of John F. Mayer and Jeremy T. Gill of Nash, Spindler, Grimstad & McCracken LLP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4199 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the brief of John F. Mayer and Jeremy T. Gill of Nash, Spindler, Grimstad & McCracken LLP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
statements should have been suppressed. There the court noted: [T]he officers entered [Bond’s] bedroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
statements should have been suppressed. There the court noted: [T]he officers entered [Bond’s] bedroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15