Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 65852 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34191 - 34200 of 65852 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
standard of law to the facts of record. Id. We independently determine whether the correct standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36053 - 2009-04-01
standard of law to the facts of record. Id. We independently determine whether the correct standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36053 - 2009-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
for affirming the revocation. The appeal decision stated in relevant part: The record supports the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60986 - 2011-03-14
for affirming the revocation. The appeal decision stated in relevant part: The record supports the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60986 - 2011-03-14
Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
evidence only if the record reveals that, “considering all credible evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
evidence only if the record reveals that, “considering all credible evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary M. Kratochwill
emergency lights, nor did he turn on the siren. Additionally, there is no evidence in the record to suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16065 - 2005-03-31
emergency lights, nor did he turn on the siren. Additionally, there is no evidence in the record to suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16065 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brooks did not file a response. We concluded that the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75105 - 2011-12-12
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brooks did not file a response. We concluded that the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75105 - 2011-12-12
Appeal No
records in the possession of the police be produced before a court commissioner.[1] The court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27550 - 2006-12-26
records in the possession of the police be produced before a court commissioner.[1] The court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27550 - 2006-12-26
State v. Reed Cudnohusky
. We conclude that it was reasonable for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that it was reasonable for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Taylor
the photographs of the lineup and the lineup reports in the appellate record. An appellant has a duty to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11546 - 2005-03-31
the photographs of the lineup and the lineup reports in the appellate record. An appellant has a duty to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11546 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant’s personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant’s personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10