Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 29739 for des.
Search results 3421 - 3430 of 29739 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Cincinnati’s duty to defend Vistelar. ¶9 “We review summary judgment determinations de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
, Cincinnati’s duty to defend Vistelar. ¶9 “We review summary judgment determinations de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
of an agency presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. DeBeck v. DNR, 172 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
of an agency presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. DeBeck v. DNR, 172 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sally J. Schultz-Fuhrman v. James R. Fuhrman
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26285 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26285 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lamb v. Manning, 145 Wis. 2d 619, 628, 427 N.W.2d 437 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lamb v. Manning, 145 Wis. 2d 619, 628, 427 N.W.2d 437 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v. Albert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256051 - 2020-03-13
). The application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v. Albert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256051 - 2020-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey O. Bates
that we review de novo. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). ¶6 Bates Sr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4828 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). ¶6 Bates Sr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4828 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) is competent to proceed without counsel. Id. We review de novo whether a waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85647 - 2014-09-15
) is competent to proceed without counsel. Id. We review de novo whether a waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 23
6 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
6 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact which we review de novo. State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
of constitutional fact which we review de novo. State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
by a court commissioner. Lacy requested and was granted a trial de novo before a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31092 - 2007-12-05
by a court commissioner. Lacy requested and was granted a trial de novo before a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31092 - 2007-12-05