Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34321 - 34330 of 51600 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

COURT OF APPEALS
threatened “words to the effect of if you mess with me and my family, I will bring you down and it won’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72173 - 2011-10-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
consistent and continuous use, as long as the change is not effected for a fraudulent purpose,’” id., 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73388 - 2014-09-15

State v. Wesley Higgins
a prejudicial effect upon a hypothetical average jury. Id. at 177, 533 N.W.2d at 744-45 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10568 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
A criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel includes a corresponding right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46452 - 2010-02-02

COURT OF APPEALS
time on appeal and because the effectiveness of counsel during the revocation hearing is not an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60986 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and effects of mental illness can fluctuate over time, particularly after a patient has been incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101247 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
argues that he did not receive effective representation at trial. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28609 - 2007-03-28

[PDF] State v. Leon A. Franklin
outweighed its prejudicial effect and that any prejudicial effect could be addressed via a curative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12461 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the effectiveness of trial counsel. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29476 - 2007-06-25

[PDF] NOTICE
denying placement and visitation. Id., ¶25. Only after the order has remained in effect for a year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35966 - 2014-09-15