Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 72810 for we.
Search results 3441 - 3450 of 72810 for we.
[PDF]
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
), we conclude the court erred in dismissing his petition under that subsection. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
), we conclude the court erred in dismissing his petition under that subsection. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated” and were driving away in a truck. We conclude that the totality of the circumstances provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
intoxicated” and were driving away in a truck. We conclude that the totality of the circumstances provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
John J. Petta v. ABC Insurance Co.
. 2d 263, 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982). We conclude that the relationship between Travco and Petta’s children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6237 - 2005-03-31
. 2d 263, 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982). We conclude that the relationship between Travco and Petta’s children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the driveway permit for commercial property owned by Charles and Sharon Slater. We conclude that DHA’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172312 - 2017-09-21
the driveway permit for commercial property owned by Charles and Sharon Slater. We conclude that DHA’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
State v. Howard C. Carter
to an enhanced penalty as a repeat offender. ¶2 We conclude that Carter is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
to an enhanced penalty as a repeat offender. ¶2 We conclude that Carter is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
Richard’s placement and custody under the aegis of the parties’ divorce action. We disagree. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12243 - 2017-09-21
Richard’s placement and custody under the aegis of the parties’ divorce action. We disagree. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
on this appeal. First, we must determine the admissibility of the oral statements which Armstrong made before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17237 - 2017-09-21
on this appeal. First, we must determine the admissibility of the oral statements which Armstrong made before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
on this appeal. First, we must determine the admissibility of the oral statements which Armstrong made before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
on this appeal. First, we must determine the admissibility of the oral statements which Armstrong made before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
required restitution to the insurers. ¶2 We conclude the victim’s loss of sick leave is “special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5432 - 2017-09-19
required restitution to the insurers. ¶2 We conclude the victim’s loss of sick leave is “special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5432 - 2017-09-19