Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34431 - 34440 of 38914 for c's.
Search results 34431 - 34440 of 38914 for c's.
[PDF]
WI APP 4
by the sentencing court under sub. (9g) or s. 302.045 (3m) (b) 1., 302.05 (3) (c) 2. a., or 973.195 (1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27177 - 2014-09-15
by the sentencing court under sub. (9g) or s. 302.045 (3m) (b) 1., 302.05 (3) (c) 2. a., or 973.195 (1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27177 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as will effectuate the purpose of this subchapter … (§ 111.39(4)(c)). ¶23 We interpret the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172912 - 2017-09-21
as will effectuate the purpose of this subchapter … (§ 111.39(4)(c)). ¶23 We interpret the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172912 - 2017-09-21
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. C. Lesser-Included Offenses Claim. ¶23 Goodlow’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14910 - 2005-03-31
that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. C. Lesser-Included Offenses Claim. ¶23 Goodlow’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14910 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demarrus D. Willis
] C. Admission of other-acts evidence against Willis. Willis also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11904 - 2005-03-31
] C. Admission of other-acts evidence against Willis. Willis also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11904 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, our supreme court directed that, “[c]onsidering the double jeopardy interests, the reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
, our supreme court directed that, “[c]onsidering the double jeopardy interests, the reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
State v. Charles B. Knudtson
of the circuit court for Dane County: gerald c. nichol, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17890 - 2005-05-02
of the circuit court for Dane County: gerald c. nichol, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17890 - 2005-05-02
State v. Walter Lee Thomas
evidentiary theory; (b) failed to object to the testimony of the victim’s cousin; (c) failed to sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11162 - 2005-03-31
evidentiary theory; (b) failed to object to the testimony of the victim’s cousin; (c) failed to sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11162 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of Referee Richard C. Ninneman approving the Stipulation and No Contest Plea filed by the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116190 - 2014-07-07
of Referee Richard C. Ninneman approving the Stipulation and No Contest Plea filed by the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116190 - 2014-07-07
State v. Blaine S. Grayson
. Consequently, he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. C. New Trial in the Interest of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7465 - 2005-03-31
. Consequently, he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. C. New Trial in the Interest of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger I. Abrahams
as an excited utterance. No. 01-1923-CR 8 C. Ineffective Assistance. ¶17 Abrahams next asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4197 - 2017-09-19
as an excited utterance. No. 01-1923-CR 8 C. Ineffective Assistance. ¶17 Abrahams next asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4197 - 2017-09-19