Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 5705 for writ.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 5705 for writ.
2009 WI App 133
(1946). Drankovich filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after serving a substantial number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39250 - 2009-09-28
(1946). Drankovich filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after serving a substantial number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39250 - 2009-09-28
Frontsheet
-conviction matters. In June 2007 W.J. filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44120 - 2009-11-30
-conviction matters. In June 2007 W.J. filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44120 - 2009-11-30
[PDF]
WI 102
for writ of habeas corpus with the court of appeals alleging that Attorney Langkamp and successor counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44120 - 2014-09-15
for writ of habeas corpus with the court of appeals alleging that Attorney Langkamp and successor counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44120 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, however, note that he had petitioned a federal court for a writ of habeas corpus, implying that summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168807 - 2017-09-21
, however, note that he had petitioned a federal court for a writ of habeas corpus, implying that summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 146
, the court ruled, “a defendant must petition the appellate court that heard the appeal for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33673 - 2014-09-15
, the court ruled, “a defendant must petition the appellate court that heard the appeal for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33673 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Stanley Washington v. David H. Schwarz
in an amended appeal decision. Washington then filed a petition No. 00-0004 7 for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
in an amended appeal decision. Washington then filed a petition No. 00-0004 7 for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
Clark Wolff v. Grant County Board of Adjustment
a writ of mandamus, pursuant to the BOA’s motion for summary judgment. This court reviews summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3632 - 2005-03-31
a writ of mandamus, pursuant to the BOA’s motion for summary judgment. This court reviews summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3632 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2021
presiding, that granted a writ of certiorari in favor of the City of Waukesha to review the City’s
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435981 - 2021-10-13
presiding, that granted a writ of certiorari in favor of the City of Waukesha to review the City’s
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435981 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259913 - 2020-05-05
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259913 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176708 - 2017-09-21
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176708 - 2017-09-21