Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34601 - 34610 of 37710 for d's.
Search results 34601 - 34610 of 37710 for d's.
State v. Juan Eugenio
a particular witness’s credibility. See 7 Daniel D. Blinka, Wisconsin Practice: Evidence § 608.1, at 296 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10834 - 2005-03-31
a particular witness’s credibility. See 7 Daniel D. Blinka, Wisconsin Practice: Evidence § 608.1, at 296 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: FRANK D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708504 - 2023-09-28
., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: FRANK D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708504 - 2023-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the prosecutor. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence. ¶30 Starks’s last claim is that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34975 - 2009-01-19
of the prosecutor. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence. ¶30 Starks’s last claim is that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34975 - 2009-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 322; WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06
.2d 322; WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 940.225(2)(d) (2009-10),[1] third-degree sexual assault, in violation of § 940.225(3), and disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87315 - 2012-09-19
. § 940.225(2)(d) (2009-10),[1] third-degree sexual assault, in violation of § 940.225(3), and disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87315 - 2012-09-19
State v. Edward W. Fisher
on the brief of Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18573 - 2005-08-08
on the brief of Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18573 - 2005-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Augustin Lopez
)(cm), (d), (e), (f), (g) or (h) by possessing with intent to deliver, a controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10007 - 2017-09-19
)(cm), (d), (e), (f), (g) or (h) by possessing with intent to deliver, a controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10007 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frederick H.
a pretrial order in so far as it “require[d] the jury to consider as true the findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3240 - 2017-09-19
a pretrial order in so far as it “require[d] the jury to consider as true the findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3240 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d), (1)(e). “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63568 - 2014-09-15
by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d), (1)(e). “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that defense counsel “misstated the law” when he “merge[d] the issues of causation and standard of care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193616 - 2017-09-21
that defense counsel “misstated the law” when he “merge[d] the issues of causation and standard of care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193616 - 2017-09-21