Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34611 - 34620 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34611 - 34620 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
or obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). He contends that his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
or obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). He contends that his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Phone Partners Limited Partnership v. C.F. Communications Corporation
contended that CFCC had not complied with the terms of the stipulation. As a result, it brought a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8061 - 2017-09-19
contended that CFCC had not complied with the terms of the stipulation. As a result, it brought a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8061 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm.[1] BACKGROUND ¶2 Hall was charged with three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102958 - 2013-10-14
postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm.[1] BACKGROUND ¶2 Hall was charged with three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102958 - 2013-10-14
State v. Christopher Walker
denying his postconviction motion. He raises three issues for our consideration: (1) whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. He raises three issues for our consideration: (1) whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after the State charged him with two counts of armed robbery. In support of his motion, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
after the State charged him with two counts of armed robbery. In support of his motion, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of a restricted controlled substance in his blood, contrary to § 346.63(1)(am). ¶3 Hubbard filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119189 - 2014-08-12
of a restricted controlled substance in his blood, contrary to § 346.63(1)(am). ¶3 Hubbard filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119189 - 2014-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 Massey exercised his postconviction and appellate rights, filing a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100417 - 2017-09-21
. ¶3 Massey exercised his postconviction and appellate rights, filing a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100417 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and misrepresentation claims against CBL Partners, LLC, and its member, Lon Feia, and denied his motions after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35753 - 2014-09-15
and misrepresentation claims against CBL Partners, LLC, and its member, Lon Feia, and denied his motions after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35753 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the amount of $8900. Prahst filed a post-verdict motion to change the answer on the verdict form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206749 - 2018-01-09
in the amount of $8900. Prahst filed a post-verdict motion to change the answer on the verdict form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206749 - 2018-01-09