Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34611 - 34620 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34611 - 34620 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
that Buske forfeited the right to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84177 - 2012-06-27
that Buske forfeited the right to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84177 - 2012-06-27
State v. Edward D. Lewis
-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
its motion for summary judgment and granting Investment Real Estate Specialists, LCC’s (Specialists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142715 - 2015-06-01
its motion for summary judgment and granting Investment Real Estate Specialists, LCC’s (Specialists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142715 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Willie Nunn
939.05 (2001-02). 1 Nunn also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19093 - 2017-09-21
939.05 (2001-02). 1 Nunn also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard D. Martin
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie E. Fleming
, a sentencing order and an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject Fleming’s arguments: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
, a sentencing order and an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject Fleming’s arguments: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. appeals the denial of her post‑dispositional motion, brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.46 and 806.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134598 - 2015-02-09
. appeals the denial of her post‑dispositional motion, brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.46 and 806.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134598 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
4 him. In December 2014, the OLR filed with this court a notice of motion and motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189397 - 2017-09-21
4 him. In December 2014, the OLR filed with this court a notice of motion and motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that these allegations, if believed by a jury, amount to entrapment. But the trial court granted the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14