Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34651 - 34660 of 65135 for or b.

COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3)(b) and (c). In Reierson, we held that “the officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137235 - 2015-03-11

State v. Sarah E. Johnson
enter a guilty plea to the charge of disposing evidence, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.47(1)(b),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3583 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 66
an audible signal by means of a siren or exhaust whistle.” See § 346.03(2)(b) & (3). Brown reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83037 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Randall W. Edwards
in determining the admissibility of this evidence. We agree. RULE 609(B) of the FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11393 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
or should have known of any claim well before the filing of the Complaint; b) The Defendant[] and Third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123698 - 2014-10-14

CA Blank Order
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 941.20(1m)(b), and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101127 - 2013-08-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for reversal). No. 2015AP702-CR 5 B. Jury instruction ¶7 “A [circuit] court has wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170456 - 2017-09-21

N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
sexual contact with [N.E.M.]? [Answer:] 20 times QUESTION 6: . . . b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16995 - 2005-03-31

Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
four-year-old Sierra B. Sierra’s mother and Berard’s wife, Dawn, were long-time friends. Sierra often
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76973 - 2012-01-24