Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 74557 for public records.

[PDF] State v. John A. Holub
the field sobriety tests in a hallway open to the public. After the tests were complete, Holub was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2793 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Benes
a new rule of law and decides an issue of substantial and continuing public interest. We further note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14770 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the easement as unenforceable and against public policy. We reject Johnson’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34004 - 2008-09-15

Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater
under the following conditions: Property Held In Trust In Public Interest. Property that is owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11012 - 2005-03-31

Barbara R.K. v. James G.
is eliminated. ¶12 The public policy of this state encourages economic and efficient use of judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2005-03-31

State v. Quincy Ferguson
public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
for publication in the official reports. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28270 - 2007-02-28

[PDF] Randall J. Kettner v. Diane B. Conradt
court failed to consider binding precedent and that public policy does not support extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10985 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary E. Andrashko
claims. He also contended that the matter was referred to the office of the state public defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the setback to be further back. The Board concluded the variance was not contrary to the public interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32727 - 2008-05-19