Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34861 - 34870 of 63529 for records.
Search results 34861 - 34870 of 63529 for records.
State v. Christopher Lee Davis
to examine the record to determine whether the exercise of discretion was proper in this case. A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2445 - 2005-03-31
to examine the record to determine whether the exercise of discretion was proper in this case. A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this No. 2019AP2425-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this No. 2019AP2425-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Herbert L. Usow
it with the arbitration panel. ¶9 The arbitration panel determined that Attorney Usow’s file records were inadequate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17183 - 2017-09-21
it with the arbitration panel. ¶9 The arbitration panel determined that Attorney Usow’s file records were inadequate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Neither party argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6). Neither party argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965316 - 2025-06-04
Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31
. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence in the record. DISCUSSION ¶14 On appeal, we review the agency’s decision, not the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55305 - 2014-09-15
evidence in the record. DISCUSSION ¶14 On appeal, we review the agency’s decision, not the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55305 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
discretionary act based on the other facts of the record.” Id. at 974. ¶13 Jace argues that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
discretionary act based on the other facts of the record.” Id. at 974. ¶13 Jace argues that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
an unwillingness to come out. There was “no record that there were any commands, either express or implicit, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
an unwillingness to come out. There was “no record that there were any commands, either express or implicit, made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
and there were sufficient facts in the record for the court to decide the issue. The court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
and there were sufficient facts in the record for the court to decide the issue. The court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 939.05 (2015-16). 1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232055 - 2019-01-09
, 939.05 (2015-16). 1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232055 - 2019-01-09