Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34941 - 34950 of 68499 for did.
Search results 34941 - 34950 of 68499 for did.
State v. Mark D. Pett
. Stat. § 904.04(2) because the State did not file a Whitty motion. See id. at 292-97. The State argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 904.04(2) because the State did not file a Whitty motion. See id. at 292-97. The State argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deann K. Baer
testified that the Bravada stopped on the bend of the driveway. He did not activate his emergency lights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
testified that the Bravada stopped on the bend of the driveway. He did not activate his emergency lights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Brian indicated that he did and explained that he was sexually abused as a child. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02
.” Brian indicated that he did and explained that he was sexually abused as a child. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
because it did not have its headlights on. McCarthy noticed an odor of intoxicants; this prompted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56138 - 2010-11-02
because it did not have its headlights on. McCarthy noticed an odor of intoxicants; this prompted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56138 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that DeLeon’s most recent postconviction motion is procedurally barred because he did not raise his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065729 - 2026-01-21
that DeLeon’s most recent postconviction motion is procedurally barred because he did not raise his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065729 - 2026-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to Ameramid. ¶5 Silverstein did not name Ameramid as a party in the complaint, move to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
to Ameramid. ¶5 Silverstein did not name Ameramid as a party in the complaint, move to amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
David Donisi v. Sharon McGann
, and that he did not mention them on the Real Estate Condition Report. He argues that the orders were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20381 - 2005-11-22
, and that he did not mention them on the Real Estate Condition Report. He argues that the orders were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20381 - 2005-11-22
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
of limitations had run on their claim against Hofbauer. Relying on Bremer's advice, the appellants did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
of limitations had run on their claim against Hofbauer. Relying on Bremer's advice, the appellants did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
State v. Zong Lor
failure to pick Lor out of a lineup or photographic array. While the jury ultimately did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6223 - 2005-03-31
failure to pick Lor out of a lineup or photographic array. While the jury ultimately did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6223 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to possess a firearm.” The juvenile court did inform Carter that his adjudication was for a felony offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144391 - 2015-07-13
to possess a firearm.” The juvenile court did inform Carter that his adjudication was for a felony offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144391 - 2015-07-13