Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 70067 for hi.
Search results 34981 - 34990 of 70067 for hi.
State v. David A. Achenbach
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] David A. Achenbach, pro se, appeals from an order denying his request for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] David A. Achenbach, pro se, appeals from an order denying his request for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(OWI) as a ninth offense. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report No. 2019AP1932-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
(OWI) as a ninth offense. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report No. 2019AP1932-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. D'Angelo
to which he was entitled. We conclude that D’Angelo forfeited his right to challenge the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2316 - 2017-09-19
to which he was entitled. We conclude that D’Angelo forfeited his right to challenge the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2316 - 2017-09-19
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
. appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification. Yanick believes he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
orders in these cases denying his petitions for positive adjustment time (PAT) pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169824 - 2017-09-21
orders in these cases denying his petitions for positive adjustment time (PAT) pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. David Turkiewicz, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his complaint seeking judicial review of four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101973 - 2017-09-21
. David Turkiewicz, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his complaint seeking judicial review of four
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101973 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lance Egner appeals from an order reconfining him to prison following the revocation of his extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47800 - 2010-03-10
. Lance Egner appeals from an order reconfining him to prison following the revocation of his extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47800 - 2010-03-10
State v. Thomas C. Conner
conclude that Conner is not entitled to relief from his sentence and therefore affirm. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11797 - 2005-03-31
conclude that Conner is not entitled to relief from his sentence and therefore affirm. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11797 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141619 - 2015-05-11
was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141619 - 2015-05-11