Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34991 - 35000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 34991 - 35000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Beverly G.
resource available. Beverly claims that it is not in Ariel’s best interests to terminate Beverly’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17898 - 2005-05-02
resource available. Beverly claims that it is not in Ariel’s best interests to terminate Beverly’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17898 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
Schillinger has not demonstrated prejudice. ¶9 Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
Schillinger has not demonstrated prejudice. ¶9 Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
to a dictionary definition of “maximize,” which defines the word as “greatest quantity or degree.” He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
to a dictionary definition of “maximize,” which defines the word as “greatest quantity or degree.” He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a postdisposition motion claiming defense counsel provided ineffective assistance for, among other things, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45696 - 2010-01-11
a postdisposition motion claiming defense counsel provided ineffective assistance for, among other things, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45696 - 2010-01-11
CA Blank Order
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
that standard. First, the record does not support Ross’s claim of undue pressure from his counsel to accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139707 - 2015-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
was not timely read his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He also claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
was not timely read his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He also claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
Certification
claim to have personally suffered a direct injury by an alleged violation of the single-subject rule
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36114 - 2009-04-08
claim to have personally suffered a direct injury by an alleged violation of the single-subject rule
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36114 - 2009-04-08
[PDF]
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
$91,000 payment. The Harrs counter-claimed for specific NO. 96-2200 3 performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11195 - 2017-09-19
$91,000 payment. The Harrs counter-claimed for specific NO. 96-2200 3 performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11195 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rayford N. Drake v. Linda F. Fikes
a postjudgment order in a divorce action denying his request for modification of maintenance. Drake claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20
a postjudgment order in a divorce action denying his request for modification of maintenance. Drake claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20