Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34991 - 35000 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 34991 - 35000 of 65155 for or b.
CA Blank Order
initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See §§ 302.045(3m)(b)1., 302.05(3)(c)2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114417 - 2014-06-09
initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See §§ 302.045(3m)(b)1., 302.05(3)(c)2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114417 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements are met: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
requirements are met: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the evidence is admissible as an exception to the rape shield statute, see WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2)(b)3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56873 - 2014-09-15
that the evidence is admissible as an exception to the rape shield statute, see WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2)(b)3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56873 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sarah E. Johnson
enter a guilty plea to the charge of disposing evidence, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.47(1)(b),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4000 - 2005-03-31
enter a guilty plea to the charge of disposing evidence, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.47(1)(b),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4000 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Tingo’s testimony was admissible, counsel was not deficient for failing to object to it. B. Failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
Tingo’s testimony was admissible, counsel was not deficient for failing to object to it. B. Failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29493 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29493 - 2014-09-15
Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31
, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, two scrivener’s errors in the judgment of conviction. The judgment lists the “939.621(1)(b)&(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243959 - 2019-07-23
, two scrivener’s errors in the judgment of conviction. The judgment lists the “939.621(1)(b)&(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243959 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
the State” and “[b]efore you can return a verdict of guilty, the evidence must satisfy you beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35413 - 2014-09-15
the State” and “[b]efore you can return a verdict of guilty, the evidence must satisfy you beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of them. See Swinson, 261 Wis. 2d 633, ¶58. B. Cera Jones ¶13 Jenkins claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91549 - 2014-09-15
of them. See Swinson, 261 Wis. 2d 633, ¶58. B. Cera Jones ¶13 Jenkins claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91549 - 2014-09-15