Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 351 - 360 of 58337 for speedy trial.
Search results 351 - 360 of 58337 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Foster argues that the State violated the Intrastate Detainers Act and his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794152 - 2024-04-30
. Foster argues that the State violated the Intrastate Detainers Act and his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794152 - 2024-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Foster argues that the State violated the Intrastate Detainers Act and his right to a speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794152 - 2024-04-30
. Foster argues that the State violated the Intrastate Detainers Act and his right to a speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794152 - 2024-04-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) that his confession was not corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) that his confession was not corroborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
be reversed and the case dismissed because his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
be reversed and the case dismissed because his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
CA Blank Order
; the information later was amended to add one count of aggravated battery. Duffie demanded a speedy trial. Twice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113846 - 2014-06-10
; the information later was amended to add one count of aggravated battery. Duffie demanded a speedy trial. Twice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113846 - 2014-06-10
State v. Charles B. Bushong
for trial was inapplicable. Bushong retained the right to request a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. § 971.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31
for trial was inapplicable. Bushong retained the right to request a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. § 971.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Demos on the grounds that the State violated the speedy trial provisions of the Interstate Agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320501 - 2021-01-06
. Demos on the grounds that the State violated the speedy trial provisions of the Interstate Agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320501 - 2021-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to instruct the jury on self-defense, his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT. § 971.10(2)(a) (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207913 - 2018-02-01
to instruct the jury on self-defense, his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT. § 971.10(2)(a) (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207913 - 2018-02-01
State v. Craig T. Bates
made a speedy trial demand. See § 971.10(2)(a), Stats. (trial to be held within ninety days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
made a speedy trial demand. See § 971.10(2)(a), Stats. (trial to be held within ninety days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig T. Bates
over for trial at a preliminary hearing held on April 18, 1995. Bates made a speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
over for trial at a preliminary hearing held on April 18, 1995. Bates made a speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19