Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35041 - 35050 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.

Kim R. Smith v. Barbara J. Eastridge
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kim Smith appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31

Paul F. Ramsey v. Robert P. Ellis
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion for a continuance. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7783 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
support and calculated Anthony’s arrearage. After Mary moved to Wisconsin, she filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131933 - 2017-09-21

Cherie Prophett v. Equity Corporation International
procession while it was in motion, thereby depriving the funeral company of an opportunity to put a flag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2914 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by denying Reuter’s presentence motion to withdraw his plea. We affirm. ¶2 The State commenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18

CA Blank Order
, for the reasons set forth in the no-merit report, that there is no arguable merit to a motion to withdraw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148193 - 2015-09-01

State v. Anthony M. Printup
cases. The court was not persuaded and denied the motion. Printup then pled guilty, reserving his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7672 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthony M. Printup
was not persuaded and denied the motion. Printup then pled guilty, reserving his right to appeal the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7672 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109066 - 2014-03-18

Robert Kopfhamer v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
and Light moved to be dismissed from the action, and the circuit court granted the motion. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13373 - 2005-03-31