Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 35071 - 35080 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for them, Marie and Homan were arrested. ¶6 After his arrest, Homan gave another statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
for them, Marie and Homan were arrested. ¶6 After his arrest, Homan gave another statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Jerry A. Maze
, himself, believed so as well. Their statements are consistent with the circuit court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13442 - 2017-09-21
, himself, believed so as well. Their statements are consistent with the circuit court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the meaning communicated by the instruction as a whole was an incorrect statement of the law.” Miller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16
that the meaning communicated by the instruction as a whole was an incorrect statement of the law.” Miller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16
State v. Chad A. Achterberg
. Included in the minutes of this document is the statement that the "ct refused to reinstate bail." Here
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16972 - 2005-03-31
. Included in the minutes of this document is the statement that the "ct refused to reinstate bail." Here
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16972 - 2005-03-31
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
and legal custody of the child.”[3] After making this statement, however, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
and legal custody of the child.”[3] After making this statement, however, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Uptown Arts and Education, Inc.
are a description of the property, the necessity for compliance with a particular ordinance, and a brief statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14401 - 2005-03-31
are a description of the property, the necessity for compliance with a particular ordinance, and a brief statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14401 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
statements about employees, inmates, offenders or the Department.” Work rule #13 states: “Intimidating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31131 - 2008-01-29
statements about employees, inmates, offenders or the Department.” Work rule #13 states: “Intimidating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31131 - 2008-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
statement suggesting that he did not remain at the scene for any significant amount of time after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27
statement suggesting that he did not remain at the scene for any significant amount of time after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27
State v. Jason K.
to the holdings in those cases. True, dicta “is a statement not addressed to the question before the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2930 - 2005-03-31
to the holdings in those cases. True, dicta “is a statement not addressed to the question before the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2930 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
N.W.2d 169, 173 (Ct. App. 1988), which may be made by inferring intent from the acts and statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8236 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 169, 173 (Ct. App. 1988), which may be made by inferring intent from the acts and statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8236 - 2017-09-19