Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35201 - 35210 of 63759 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35201 - 35210 of 63759 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Nipulchandra Patel v. Robert J. Bukowski
erred in denying his summary judgment motion to dismiss Patel’s punitive damages claim. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
erred in denying his summary judgment motion to dismiss Patel’s punitive damages claim. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10760 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Markham O. Mayne
of conviction and from an order denying his postconviction motion No. 99-3111-CR 2 without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21
of conviction and from an order denying his postconviction motion No. 99-3111-CR 2 without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 48.415(1)(a)2., (2)(a), (6). The County then filed a motion, supported by an affidavit of a human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
. §§ 48.415(1)(a)2., (2)(a), (6). The County then filed a motion, supported by an affidavit of a human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
) (2003-04).[1] He appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order[2] denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
involuntary. Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Bent’s suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
involuntary. Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Bent’s suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
involuntary. Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Bent’s suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
involuntary. Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Bent’s suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
WI APP 68
denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15
denied his motion to suppress.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 The essential facts are not disputed. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15