Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 45829 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 35231 - 35240 of 45829 for paternity test paper work.
John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. John BBB
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. John BBB
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28
State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
to test the accuracy of the officers’ trial testimony and point out any discrepancies among the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
to test the accuracy of the officers’ trial testimony and point out any discrepancies among the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric L. King
“totality of the circumstances” test). However, since this search did not lead to the officer’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
“totality of the circumstances” test). However, since this search did not lead to the officer’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test that asks what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54981 - 2010-09-29
. ¶12 The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test that asks what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54981 - 2010-09-29
State v. Bradley Zylka
and that it was not properly tested because: (1) defense counsel did not obtain a transcript of the preliminary examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16043 - 2005-03-31
and that it was not properly tested because: (1) defense counsel did not obtain a transcript of the preliminary examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and had glassy, watery, bloodshot eyes. The officer said that he did not conduct field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99748 - 2014-09-15
and had glassy, watery, bloodshot eyes. The officer said that he did not conduct field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99748 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and unparticularized suspicion or ‘hunch,’” Terry, 443 U.S. at 27. We apply an objective test, id., 392 U.S. at 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
and unparticularized suspicion or ‘hunch,’” Terry, 443 U.S. at 27. We apply an objective test, id., 392 U.S. at 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
State v. Roy J. Jones
). If the newly discovered evidence fails to meet any one of these tests, the defendant is not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19
). If the newly discovered evidence fails to meet any one of these tests, the defendant is not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
was a test of credibility between Gould and Aaron. ¶11 The State argues that Gould
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31
was a test of credibility between Gould and Aaron. ¶11 The State argues that Gould
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31