Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35351 - 35360 of 38502 for t's.
Search results 35351 - 35360 of 38502 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Stanley L. Felton
was a competent expert who should have been allowed to provide crucial testimony. He states: “[I]t cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18455 - 2017-09-21
was a competent expert who should have been allowed to provide crucial testimony. He states: “[I]t cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18455 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mario D. Tye
the McCleary standards) recognized: [T]hat the exercise of discretion does not lend itself to mathematical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20594 - 2005-12-12
the McCleary standards) recognized: [T]hat the exercise of discretion does not lend itself to mathematical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20594 - 2005-12-12
State v. Julian Lopez
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. In order to succeed, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6675 - 2005-03-31
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. In order to succeed, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6675 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
states that it assigns to Lyon PECC/CoActiv’s interest in the “[t]ransactions described on the attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73607 - 2011-11-09
states that it assigns to Lyon PECC/CoActiv’s interest in the “[t]ransactions described on the attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73607 - 2011-11-09
State v. Stephen R. Hart
whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. In other words, "[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. In other words, "[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Lalor
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of T. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2830 - 2005-03-31
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of T. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2830 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 27
on improper reasoning; while “[i]t may be that in [her] heart of hearts the arbitrator” based her decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44735 - 2011-02-07
on improper reasoning; while “[i]t may be that in [her] heart of hearts the arbitrator” based her decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44735 - 2011-02-07
State v. Tony M. Smith
of clarity, we note that the Hon. Rudolph T. Randa presided over the plea hearing, the Hon. John J. DiMotto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8413 - 2005-03-31
of clarity, we note that the Hon. Rudolph T. Randa presided over the plea hearing, the Hon. John J. DiMotto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8413 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, “[t]he ultimate determination[s] of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, “[t]he ultimate determination[s] of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
Linda Griffin v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
in McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961): [T]he Fourteenth Amendment permits the States a wide scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2437 - 2005-03-31
in McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961): [T]he Fourteenth Amendment permits the States a wide scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2437 - 2005-03-31