Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 17229 for probate/1000.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 17229 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
believed that the court could give him a probation disposition, which was not in fact a sentencing option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74287 - 2011-11-22
believed that the court could give him a probation disposition, which was not in fact a sentencing option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74287 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF32
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 On April 12, 2013, Velez-Figueroa was on probation in Milwaukee County Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 On April 12, 2013, Velez-Figueroa was on probation in Milwaukee County Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190344 - 2017-09-21
judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190344 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. Nuchell
to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation. We affirm. Nuchell was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31
to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation. We affirm. Nuchell was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31
Howard L. Alt v. Smith & Associates, Inc.
was merely ambiguous, not illusory, with the ambiguity curable by extrinsic evidence; (2) a probate court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15306 - 2005-03-31
was merely ambiguous, not illusory, with the ambiguity curable by extrinsic evidence; (2) a probate court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15306 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Miller
property in the most recent case precipitated the revocation of probation in the two older cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
property in the most recent case precipitated the revocation of probation in the two older cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals from a circuit court order denying his petition for certiorari review of a probation revocation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193382 - 2017-09-21
, appeals from a circuit court order denying his petition for certiorari review of a probation revocation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193382 - 2017-09-21
John M. Langer v.
that Attorney John M. Langer be publicly reprimanded as discipline for neglecting the probate of an estate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17187 - 2005-03-31
that Attorney John M. Langer be publicly reprimanded as discipline for neglecting the probate of an estate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17187 - 2005-03-31