Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35631 - 35640 of 41602 for she.
Search results 35631 - 35640 of 41602 for she.
COURT OF APPEALS
forfeits appellate review of any grounds to suppress evidence that he or she does not present to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
forfeits appellate review of any grounds to suppress evidence that he or she does not present to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Sean Patrick Okray
bargain if he or she materially breaches the plea agreement). We therefore reject Okray’s attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13126 - 2017-09-21
bargain if he or she materially breaches the plea agreement). We therefore reject Okray’s attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13126 - 2017-09-21
State v. James W. Whistleman
of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class E felony: (1) The person knows that he or she possesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class E felony: (1) The person knows that he or she possesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2012AP665 Cir. Ct. No. 2003ME63
. or whether she was transferred due to a violation of the conditions for the patient’s less restrictive
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86770 - 2014-09-15
. or whether she was transferred due to a violation of the conditions for the patient’s less restrictive
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86770 - 2014-09-15
State v. Allee Boone
presented the testimony of four witnesses. Sparkle Hopson testified that the morning after the shooting she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
presented the testimony of four witnesses. Sparkle Hopson testified that the morning after the shooting she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if he or she can show that appellate counsel and the court of appeals did not follow the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
if he or she can show that appellate counsel and the court of appeals did not follow the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
performance was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15176 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
809.32. No. 01-1625 4 she was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4083 - 2017-09-20
809.32. No. 01-1625 4 she was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4083 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 46
is measured by whether he or she is able to assist counsel and make decisions pertaining to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
is measured by whether he or she is able to assist counsel and make decisions pertaining to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient, and that he or she was actually prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient, and that he or she was actually prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08