Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 68502 for did.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 68502 for did.
State v. Carl J. Johnson, Jr.
determined that a change in parole policy did not entitle Johnson to sentence modification unless parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
determined that a change in parole policy did not entitle Johnson to sentence modification unless parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
an investigative stop. Triggs argues that the police did not have a reasonable suspicion upon which to base
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18
an investigative stop. Triggs argues that the police did not have a reasonable suspicion upon which to base
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18
State v. Robert J. Lochemes
regarding his right to refuse the test and, further, that no harm occurred because the State did actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2010-02-28
regarding his right to refuse the test and, further, that no harm occurred because the State did actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2010-02-28
CA Blank Order
a response, but she did not do so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136511 - 2015-03-01
a response, but she did not do so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136511 - 2015-03-01
Design Services v. DNR
Wells contends that he has evidence proving that he did not sign the deed until January 2, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
Wells contends that he has evidence proving that he did not sign the deed until January 2, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
COURT OF APPEALS
by finding him in contempt because he did not intentionally fail to make the maintenance payments. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106856 - 2014-01-21
by finding him in contempt because he did not intentionally fail to make the maintenance payments. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106856 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Taylor, 2006 WI 22, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 710 N.W.2d 466). ¶7 Hankins contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
. Taylor, 2006 WI 22, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 710 N.W.2d 466). ¶7 Hankins contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
County of Door v. Kerry Denil
the property owner sells out. In sum, the cost share contract did not create a liquidated damages clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8246 - 2005-03-31
the property owner sells out. In sum, the cost share contract did not create a liquidated damages clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8246 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth L. Dade
. ¶4 Next, Dade claims that the court did not, in fact, exercise its discretion, but merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15896 - 2005-03-31
. ¶4 Next, Dade claims that the court did not, in fact, exercise its discretion, but merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15896 - 2005-03-31