Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 68502 for did.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 68502 for did.
Kim T. Timm v. Dennis L. Timm
court did accept other recommendations[1] made by the guardian ad litem and incorporated them into its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9659 - 2005-03-31
court did accept other recommendations[1] made by the guardian ad litem and incorporated them into its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9659 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl J. Johnson, Jr.
determined that a change in parole policy did not entitle Johnson to sentence modification unless parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
determined that a change in parole policy did not entitle Johnson to sentence modification unless parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18238 - 2005-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, MacArthur was seated in a vehicle that was parked in a lot adjacent to the alley. West did not recall where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
, MacArthur was seated in a vehicle that was parked in a lot adjacent to the alley. West did not recall where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
State v. Heriberto Castillo, Jr.
' decision was adverse because it did not address whether Wis. Stat. ch. 980 is unconstitutional as applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17027 - 2005-03-31
' decision was adverse because it did not address whether Wis. Stat. ch. 980 is unconstitutional as applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17027 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
result in a lesser sentence. Contrary to Oleson’s assertion, the circuit court did treat Oleson’s bipolar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106256 - 2011-08-08
result in a lesser sentence. Contrary to Oleson’s assertion, the circuit court did treat Oleson’s bipolar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106256 - 2011-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
considered Guardian’s affirmative defense of statutory immunity, which he did not bring up in his pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140756 - 2015-04-28
considered Guardian’s affirmative defense of statutory immunity, which he did not bring up in his pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140756 - 2015-04-28
Paula L. Moebius v. General Casualty Insurance Co.
not affect the substantial rights of a party. Section 805.18(2), Stats.[2] The trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9998 - 2005-03-31
not affect the substantial rights of a party. Section 805.18(2), Stats.[2] The trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9998 - 2005-03-31
Helena Fedders v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
that the two policies did not provide coverage for the accident. The order, however, allowed the Stearnses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15629 - 2005-03-31
that the two policies did not provide coverage for the accident. The order, however, allowed the Stearnses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15629 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
under the “substantial change of circumstances” standard. The court also found that “Varma did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42253 - 2009-10-14
under the “substantial change of circumstances” standard. The court also found that “Varma did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42253 - 2009-10-14