Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 51909 for him.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 51909 for him.
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Brian Goodson appeals a judgment sentencing him for armed robbery as a party to a crime. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
CURIAM. Brian Goodson appeals a judgment sentencing him for armed robbery as a party to a crime. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
CA Blank Order
intoxicated as a sixth offense. The circuit court sentenced him to two years and six months of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
intoxicated as a sixth offense. The circuit court sentenced him to two years and six months of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
him should be invalidated because he received inadequate notice. This appeal is undeveloped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
him should be invalidated because he received inadequate notice. This appeal is undeveloped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
State v. Dariell D. Cross
appeals from a judgment convicting him of battery by a prisoner contrary to § 940.20(1), Stats. Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment convicting him of battery by a prisoner contrary to § 940.20(1), Stats. Cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
advised him of his right to file a response. Polk has not responded. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250459 - 2019-11-19
advised him of his right to file a response. Polk has not responded. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250459 - 2019-11-19
County of Dane v. John W. Moore
of the circuit court convicting him of disorderly conduct contrary to Madison General Ordinance § 32.03. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5159 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court convicting him of disorderly conduct contrary to Madison General Ordinance § 32.03. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5159 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of the charges. He further asserted that his trial attorney did not explain the elements of the charges to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-19
of the charges. He further asserted that his trial attorney did not explain the elements of the charges to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-19
Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
or thereabout, Hill stated that Hughes had called him, but he told Hughes “that he could not open a gravel pit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
or thereabout, Hill stated that Hughes had called him, but he told Hughes “that he could not open a gravel pit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court found the child recognized his father, but did not have a substantial relationship with him due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171127 - 2017-09-21
. The court found the child recognized his father, but did not have a substantial relationship with him due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171127 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because a witness against him has recanted her testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
that he is entitled to a new trial because a witness against him has recanted her testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14