Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
WI APP 160
, P.J. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order granting John Hartwig’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
, P.J. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order granting John Hartwig’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28815 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court failed to give a curative instruction. Sexton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court failed to give a curative instruction. Sexton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
denied his motion to suppress the gun and marijuana. We affirm his No. 01-2797-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
denied his motion to suppress the gun and marijuana. We affirm his No. 01-2797-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial after a prospective juror revealed Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71225 - 2011-09-26
a mistrial after a prospective juror revealed Sexton’s custodial status to the jury panel and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71225 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
that made the situation custodial. ¶12 When reviewing a motion to suppress: [W]e engage in a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
that made the situation custodial. ¶12 When reviewing a motion to suppress: [W]e engage in a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
custody, placement, and reasonable support, and No. 2022AP126 2 an order establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
State v. Matthew J. Lazarewicz
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress which challenged the legality of his arrest. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3252 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress which challenged the legality of his arrest. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3252 - 2005-03-31
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31
. According to that statement, which was faxed to the court at 3:36 p.m., Michael was taken into custody at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7666 - 2005-03-31