Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35901 - 35910 of 50524 for our.
Search results 35901 - 35910 of 50524 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel because he can show no prejudice. With regard to the State’s sentencing remarks, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2008-04-14
of counsel because he can show no prejudice. With regard to the State’s sentencing remarks, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
809.107(6)(e). Conflicts in this court’s calendar and other expedited appeals on our docket have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239610 - 2019-04-23
809.107(6)(e). Conflicts in this court’s calendar and other expedited appeals on our docket have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239610 - 2019-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
he would not have entered the plea.2 ¶32 We save for our discussion below relevant findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60386 - 2014-09-15
he would not have entered the plea.2 ¶32 We save for our discussion below relevant findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60386 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a competency evaluation on April 16 and on April 20 after his Trazodone overdose. Our analysis is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30209 - 2014-09-15
for a competency evaluation on April 16 and on April 20 after his Trazodone overdose. Our analysis is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 752.35. Our power of discretionary reversal under § 752.35 is formidable, however, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17
. § 752.35. Our power of discretionary reversal under § 752.35 is formidable, however, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17
State v. Otis G. Mattox
a mistrial sua sponte against any legal test. ¶15 Moreover, our review of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
a mistrial sua sponte against any legal test. ¶15 Moreover, our review of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
2008 WI APP 154
grounds standard. Id. at 873-76. ¶11 Our review of whether a search is a police or probationary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
grounds standard. Id. at 873-76. ¶11 Our review of whether a search is a police or probationary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at that time and gave the boat a “sea trial.” The boat “passed our water test,” and the technician “sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
at that time and gave the boat a “sea trial.” The boat “passed our water test,” and the technician “sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the plea negotiations and, more importantly, he has not claimed that he believed otherwise. Finally, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
the plea negotiations and, more importantly, he has not claimed that he believed otherwise. Finally, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
2011 WI APP 18
agreement. Four factors, in combination, lead us to our conclusion. ¶10 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57418 - 2011-01-30
agreement. Four factors, in combination, lead us to our conclusion. ¶10 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57418 - 2011-01-30