Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36101 - 36110 of 65039 for timed.

COURT OF APPEALS
of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52529 - 2010-07-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reincarceration time in the Winnebago county case on October 22, 2001. Because this postdates his August 2001
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156354 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 2011. He was instructed to come back for an appointment on June 23, 2011, at which time they would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102236 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rita Mae Schilcher v. Michael Schilcher
at that time. We perceive no injustice in requiring him to pay interest for retaining the property until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14512 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Gregory J. Straub
are not paid within the time specified, and absent a showing to this court of his inability to pay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16865 - 2017-09-21

State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
] This testimony was consistent with Penigar’s statement at the time he entered his plea, that he did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
disappear, but it doesn’t. Time makes it less. We redirect ourselves to other things, and a day does go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107967 - 2014-02-12

[PDF] Michael T. Rohrer v. Mark T. Willis
with Badger Window at the time the Rohrers hired Badger. The trial court, in essence, found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5411 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
not locate the gun. ¶3 Police called King the next day. She was not at the residence at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17

Rita Mae Schilcher v. Michael Schilcher
equalization payment would have been due at that time. We perceive no injustice in requiring him to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14512 - 2005-03-31