Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Deon Vance
statement of the maximum sentences. The court noted that pursuant to the information, Vance faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5772 - 2017-09-19
statement of the maximum sentences. The court noted that pursuant to the information, Vance faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5772 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
objection by Brown’s trial counsel, to testify to statements made by a victim, and, in other instances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215195 - 2018-07-02
objection by Brown’s trial counsel, to testify to statements made by a victim, and, in other instances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215195 - 2018-07-02
State v. Carrie K. Elmer
of possession with intent to deliver, could testify that he made statements incriminating himself as the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
of possession with intent to deliver, could testify that he made statements incriminating himself as the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Davison
to § 940.19 is incorrect. ¶20 Based on the clear statement provided in WIS. STAT. § 939.66(2m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
to § 940.19 is incorrect. ¶20 Based on the clear statement provided in WIS. STAT. § 939.66(2m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Williams
to note Green’s consent in his written reports, and his failure to recall Green’s exact statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
to note Green’s consent in his written reports, and his failure to recall Green’s exact statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2024
are "guarded" and protected, but also said that Kindschy having to endure intimidation from Aish's statements
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772358 - 2024-02-29
are "guarded" and protected, but also said that Kindschy having to endure intimidation from Aish's statements
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772358 - 2024-02-29
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 20-03 - Comments from Attorney James A. Olson
to the effect that they were not influenced by partisan factors; indeed, we find those statements to be almost
/supreme/docs/2003commentsolson.pdf - 2020-11-30
to the effect that they were not influenced by partisan factors; indeed, we find those statements to be almost
/supreme/docs/2003commentsolson.pdf - 2020-11-30
[PDF]
Microsoft Word - 20211013 FINAL Legislature Letter Brief re Timing.doc
appears to be based on this Court’s statement in Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections Board, expressing concern
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefswislegis.pdf - 2021-10-18
appears to be based on this Court’s statement in Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections Board, expressing concern
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefswislegis.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
of this statement, OLR cites (1) Attorney Luening’s two consensual public reprimands; (2) two cases that were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627062 - 2023-04-17
of this statement, OLR cites (1) Attorney Luening’s two consensual public reprimands; (2) two cases that were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627062 - 2023-04-17