Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 69044 for had.

State v. John A. Lettice
. Koeppl, a psychologist, saw D.L. several times at Lucareli's request to determine whether D.L. had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31

State v. George C. Harrell
that one of the victims had pending drug charges. Finally, Harrell contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31

Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
, the commissioner concluded that the court had jurisdiction over Oimoen through the “long-arm” provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13023 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gerald W. Knudtson
if they had asked to be touched. In response to the State's objection, defense counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10978 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karin Palumbo v. Brian Kidder
. ¶3 Bartie agreed that Palumbo had a preexisting degenerative condition that was aggravated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3945 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
offending behavior, finding she had given evasive discovery responses, made excessive discovery requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132838 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
which led to the trial court’s finding that the statutory underpinnings of § 196.643, STATS., had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rupert J. Loeffler v. Emma G. Loeffler
not contest that counsel had adequate grounds to withdraw; instead, he argues that he was not provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9281 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP203 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV285
. Neither Basic nor CePro had any other business activities, and existed solely to hold CPC’s stock
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33168 - 2014-09-15

State v. Reginold B. Trussell
.” The information the dispatcher conveyed to the officer was inconsistent with what the caller had said. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31