Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
thereafter, the Department filed a motion for summary judgment solely on the issue of abandonment, alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296057 - 2020-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
entered on April 14, 2004, established their rights and responsibilities, including custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90737 - 2012-12-17

WI App 107 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP353-CR Complete Title...
cause to arrest, and the circuit court therefore erroneously denied his suppression motion. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121819 - 2014-10-28

[PDF] WI APP 107
therefore erroneously denied his suppression motion. ¶2 The State does not defend the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121819 - 2014-11-11

[PDF] State v. Leonard Bendlin
. The trial court granted the motion, ruling that under the totality of the circumstances, an “in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13630 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Certification
mitigated this framing bias. 4 2019 Senate Joint Resolution 2 sets forth the black-lined text
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466212 - 2021-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and custody of his grandparents. The circuit court extended the CHIPS order another year. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195936 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carl R. Kramer
. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),[1] and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal of the felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl R. Kramer
. STAT. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),1 and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21

State v. James G. Luck
with one count of failure to comply with an officer’s attempt to take a person into custody, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4282 - 2005-03-31