Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the Fifth Amendment by “interrogating” him while he was “in custody” without first providing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512646 - 2022-04-21
violated the Fifth Amendment by “interrogating” him while he was “in custody” without first providing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512646 - 2022-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction for repeated sexual assault of the same child and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
a judgment of conviction for repeated sexual assault of the same child and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
2008 WI App 182
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34477 - 2008-12-16
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34477 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 182
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34477 - 2014-09-15
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34477 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Certification
mitigated this framing bias. 4 2019 Senate Joint Resolution 2 sets forth the black-lined text
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466212 - 2021-12-21
mitigated this framing bias. 4 2019 Senate Joint Resolution 2 sets forth the black-lined text
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466212 - 2021-12-21
State v. Oto Orlik
, denying Orlik’s motion. The court interpreted §§ 969.01 and 969.03, Stats., to allow a court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
, denying Orlik’s motion. The court interpreted §§ 969.01 and 969.03, Stats., to allow a court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Oto Orlik
to post the cash bond—the designation of the motion as one to modify the conditions of release under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
to post the cash bond—the designation of the motion as one to modify the conditions of release under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 42
in custody in 1998, 1999, and 2001. In February 2013, the court granted Obriecht’s motion and amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21
in custody in 1998, 1999, and 2001. In February 2013, the court granted Obriecht’s motion and amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21