Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3651 - 3660 of 30059 for de.
Search results 3651 - 3660 of 30059 for de.
State v. Lee M. Henrickson
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5, 248 Wis. 2d 881, 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4812 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5, 248 Wis. 2d 881, 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4812 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
This case involves the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law; our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483464 - 2022-02-16
This case involves the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law; our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483464 - 2022-02-16
Cherie Prophett v. Equity Corporation International
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Bethke v. Lauderdale of La Crosse, Inc., 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2914 - 2005-03-31
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Bethke v. Lauderdale of La Crosse, Inc., 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
53188 Gregory S. Mager O'Neil, Cannon, Hollman, De Jong 111 East Wisconsin Ave. Suite 1400
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131933 - 2017-09-21
53188 Gregory S. Mager O'Neil, Cannon, Hollman, De Jong 111 East Wisconsin Ave. Suite 1400
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David J. Pettit
that we review de novo. See State v. Pharm, 2000 WI App 167, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 97, 617 N.W.2d 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4596 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. See State v. Pharm, 2000 WI App 167, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 97, 617 N.W.2d 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4596 - 2017-09-19
Junior Casas v. Judy Smith
, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978) (we do not review the evidence de novo, but simply determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13680 - 2005-03-31
, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20 (1978) (we do not review the evidence de novo, but simply determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13680 - 2005-03-31
Angela Noel Raether v. Andrew Gotzion
disputed, material facts, we reverse. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4925 - 2005-03-31
disputed, material facts, we reverse. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4925 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v. Albert, 2012 WI App 87, ¶8, 343 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133743 - 2015-01-27
of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v. Albert, 2012 WI App 87, ¶8, 343 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133743 - 2015-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
., appeals a small-claims judgment entered after a trial de novo in circuit court awarding Interpersonal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43246 - 2009-11-09
., appeals a small-claims judgment entered after a trial de novo in circuit court awarding Interpersonal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43246 - 2009-11-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32475 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32475 - 2014-09-15