Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36571 - 36580 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36571 - 36580 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Dairyland filed motions for summary judgment. The circuit court granted Dufour’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144506 - 2015-07-15
and Dairyland filed motions for summary judgment. The circuit court granted Dufour’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144506 - 2015-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Dairyland filed motions for summary judgment. The circuit court granted Dufour’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144506 - 2017-09-21
and Dairyland filed motions for summary judgment. The circuit court granted Dufour’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 Mack also appeals from an order partially denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 Mack also appeals from an order partially denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court denied Park Meadows’ motion for reconsideration and granted American Family’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243436 - 2019-07-16
, the trial court denied Park Meadows’ motion for reconsideration and granted American Family’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243436 - 2019-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that Chili’s had violated that restrictive covenant. Chili’s filed a cross-motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29139 - 2007-06-26
that Chili’s had violated that restrictive covenant. Chili’s filed a cross-motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29139 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
October 18, 2012
. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2021
, and unlawful possession of a firearm, and affirmed the denial of Chambers’ postconviction motion for a new
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327359 - 2021-01-21
, and unlawful possession of a firearm, and affirmed the denial of Chambers’ postconviction motion for a new
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327359 - 2021-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Robinson raises six issues. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138606 - 2015-03-30
to a crime. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Robinson raises six issues. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138606 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of conviction and an order denying his motion to suppress all evidence realized from a search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27592 - 2006-12-26
of conviction and an order denying his motion to suppress all evidence realized from a search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27592 - 2006-12-26
Courtney F. v. Ramiro M.C.
proceeding denying his motion for a protective order barring discovery of his juvenile records. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31
proceeding denying his motion for a protective order barring discovery of his juvenile records. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31