Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36601 - 36610 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36601 - 36610 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
shirt was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
shirt was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry A. Phillips
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 29, 1996, Jones pled guilty, in two cases, to a total of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 29, 1996, Jones pled guilty, in two cases, to a total of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intervened, Marion bit the daughter’s finger.2 In Milwaukee Co. case No. 2014CM2943, the State charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265879 - 2020-06-30
intervened, Marion bit the daughter’s finger.2 In Milwaukee Co. case No. 2014CM2943, the State charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265879 - 2020-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joshua Jenkins
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49969 - 2010-05-17
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49969 - 2010-05-17
State v. Leroy W. Senn
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31