Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36621 - 36630 of 64723 for b's.
Search results 36621 - 36630 of 64723 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the lack of preparation prompted him to plead guilty. B. Coercion ¶26 In addition to ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397014 - 2021-07-28
and that the lack of preparation prompted him to plead guilty. B. Coercion ¶26 In addition to ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397014 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Wienke
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10008 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10008 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 145
to act. See Hocking, 768 N.W.2d 552, ¶13 (“[B]ecause there was no duty under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
to act. See Hocking, 768 N.W.2d 552, ¶13 (“[B]ecause there was no duty under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
portion of which is as follows: [B]ased upon all of the evidence, the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16
portion of which is as follows: [B]ased upon all of the evidence, the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to and consider each other’s views.[5] B. Brian Dorsey’s Testimony ¶8 Co-defendant Gregory Hayes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
to and consider each other’s views.[5] B. Brian Dorsey’s Testimony ¶8 Co-defendant Gregory Hayes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Tammy M.
in the petition and the potential dispositions. (b) Establish whether any promises or threats were made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15910 - 2017-09-21
in the petition and the potential dispositions. (b) Establish whether any promises or threats were made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bonnie L.K.
and hearings on other matters. (b) Any period of delay resulting from a continuance granted at the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10900 - 2017-09-20
and hearings on other matters. (b) Any period of delay resulting from a continuance granted at the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10900 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
). 2 See § 974.05(1)(b), STATS. 3 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14662 - 2017-09-21
). 2 See § 974.05(1)(b), STATS. 3 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14662 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis L. Farr
(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Farr also argues double jeopardy arises from being charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Farr also argues double jeopardy arises from being charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-43, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). B. Reducing Clause. ¶11 Kelley also contends that the AAA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
-43, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). B. Reducing Clause. ¶11 Kelley also contends that the AAA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05