Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 77414 for j o e s.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 77414 for j o e s.
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
caregiver: “[O]bviously there is a mother involved … Needless to say, she is obviously a caretaker as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
caregiver: “[O]bviously there is a mother involved … Needless to say, she is obviously a caretaker as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
City of Oshkosh v. John Daggett
Code § 15-25 (emphasis added). Furthermore, “[n]o owner of any premises shall create any lead hazards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
Code § 15-25 (emphasis added). Furthermore, “[n]o owner of any premises shall create any lead hazards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
he “g[o]t a clear look at [Lee]” when he introduced himself to Lee and was “100 percent” sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
he “g[o]t a clear look at [Lee]” when he introduced himself to Lee and was “100 percent” sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
State v. Christopher L. Logan
. Thus, [t]o determine whether the entry was lawful, we must answer two questions: first, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
. Thus, [t]o determine whether the entry was lawful, we must answer two questions: first, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. U.S. CONST. amend. V; WISCONSIN CONST. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed in jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
offense. U.S. CONST. amend. V; WISCONSIN CONST. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed in jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dispositive motions “[o]therwise, we have a trial here.” The court asked how else the issue would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000004 - 2025-08-20
for dispositive motions “[o]therwise, we have a trial here.” The court asked how else the issue would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000004 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; Wisconsin Const. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; Wisconsin Const. art. I, § 8. “[O]nce a defendant is placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
by carrying a firearm and wearing a disguise. Further, the court told Smith that it could “n[o]t overlook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
by carrying a firearm and wearing a disguise. Further, the court told Smith that it could “n[o]t overlook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, “[o]ur task as a reviewing court is limited to determining whether the evidence presented could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73110 - 2011-11-08
of the evidence, “[o]ur task as a reviewing court is limited to determining whether the evidence presented could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73110 - 2011-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing with a mind made up. T[w]o, the court finds nothing improper about [the trial court’s] comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
sentencing with a mind made up. T[w]o, the court finds nothing improper about [the trial court’s] comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30