Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36841 - 36850 of 62001 for child support.
Search results 36841 - 36850 of 62001 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
essential to sustain the circuit court’s decision is supported by the record. See id. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106856 - 2017-09-21
essential to sustain the circuit court’s decision is supported by the record. See id. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106856 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
that there was no forgery, pointing to evidence in the record that supports their position.[2] Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
that there was no forgery, pointing to evidence in the record that supports their position.[2] Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
based on the evidence that supported his position. This was not error. Further, while counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
based on the evidence that supported his position. This was not error. Further, while counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contention is not supported by facts in the record. Because Carmichael did not order a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68384 - 2014-09-15
contention is not supported by facts in the record. Because Carmichael did not order a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not supported by sufficient 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53666 - 2014-09-15
is not supported by sufficient 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53666 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, testified that they did not have such an agreement. The only document that allegedly supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72370 - 2011-10-18
, testified that they did not have such an agreement. The only document that allegedly supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72370 - 2011-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Pamela Smith-Herzog
that she was not coerced. This factual finding of the jury is amply supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3498 - 2017-09-19
that she was not coerced. This factual finding of the jury is amply supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3498 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
). The no-merit report addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the lack of any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94671 - 2013-03-25
). The no-merit report addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the lack of any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94671 - 2013-03-25
CA Blank Order
, provides no support for its legal proposition. This court will not consider arguments unsupported by legal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123596 - 2014-10-07
, provides no support for its legal proposition. This court will not consider arguments unsupported by legal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123596 - 2014-10-07